Free Republic has an astonishing story to perk up your Monday morning. It appears they may have, indeed, found the Obama Kenyan Birth Certificate:
If you note the date on the Certified Copy, it was created by the Registrar in Kenya on Feb. 17, 1964. The Kenyan Birth Certificate would have been issued in the midst of the divorce — AFTER the divorce was filed by Ann in Hawaii on Jan. 20, but BEFORE the divorce was granted by Judge King on March 20.
Furthermore, it’s quite plausible that once Ann actually had this Kenyan birth certificate in her hands, and the divorce was granted on March 20, her attorney, George Kerr, counseled her on Hawaiian birth certificate “loopholes” and told her how to file for a Hawaiian “Certificate of Delayed Birth” to get Welfare or OTHER support for young Obama as a child of a non-supporting foreign national.
As Hawaiian law allows, that CODB could have been “converted” later to a “Certificate of Live Birth” (long birth certificate) in the 60s or 70s, which would then be a “root document” of the famed “Certification of Live Birth” (short birth certificate on “Fight the Smears”) we see today presented as “proof” of birth of Barack Hussein Obama II, reportedly in Hawaii (note: the abstract “Certification of Live Birth” certificate did not exist in Hawaii until November 2001).
I can’t personally vouch for the veracity of the Kenyan birth certificate itself, not knowing how or from whom Orly obtained the birth certificate (the chain of evidence). It may have been obtained quite surreptitiously from the only filed Kenyan birth certificate record copy requested — likely generated from the 1964 divorce.
HOWEVER – the dates DO “line up” for the Kenyan Birth Certificate to be REAL.
There’s much MUCH more — and a larger shot of the Birth Certificate at Free Republic HERE. Go read it now. They piece together the timeline of the Obama’s divorce, and neatly put the birth certificate right into that slot.
Now, not having a physical copy of the Birth Certificate in my hands, I can’t vouch for it’s authenticity. However, I am in posession of the Birth Certificates of my wife and her parents, who were born in Mauritius prior to 1966, when it was a member of athe British Commonwealth (just like Kenya was when BHO was born.)
And I can tell you that, with the exception of a few minor wording changes (like substituting “Mauritius” for “Kenya” and dates and such) — These Birth Certificates are nearly identical. They both follow the British Colonial template for Birth Certifications.
I can also confirm there is, indeed, a Coast Provincial General Hospital on the Mombasa, Coast of Kenya according to Google maps.
If it’s a forgery, it’s quite the forgery.
Now . . .what does this mean exactly?
Well, it means that both sides have opposing birth certificates. Up until this point the “Birthers” have had no birth certificate to support their claims; only allegations. This is why many of their lawsuits have been thrown out.
It also means the Obama camp has a Birth Certificate which has been deemed a forgery by a noted forensic expert.
So it’s not quite a stalemate; the Birthers actually have a better hand here.
And that makes all the difference in court. If Dr. Orly Taitz has a copy of this Kenyan Birth Certificate *IN HAND* when she goes to court, the court will want to see counter evidence that Obama was, indeed, born in the United States. And as long as Dr. Taitz has her forensic examiner to discount the Hawaiian birth certificate commonly seen on the Internet as a forgery, the court will want to see the original .
The vault copy from Hawaii.
Prepare for the excrement to hit the oscillating air movement device, in Three, Two, One . .
~Johnny~



I think the issue has been over-blown, esp. given the likely results. I have just posted one what is being lost as these webs are spun. See: http://soozah.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/consolidation-what-the-fight-is-really-about/